PRIMARY PATHSHALA KATHA MAFI ROOM NO 2 PS 352
4- SURAJ SINGH
SPSP446 votes at this polling station
over 2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4- SURAJ SINGH | SP | 446 | 86.77% | |
| 2 | 2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH | BJP | 43 | 8.37% | |
| 3 | 3- RAMA KASHYAP | INC | 18 | 3.50% | |
| 4 | 1- MOHD. ZAKI | BSP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 5 | 13- SURAJ SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 6 | 5- AJAY KUMAR PRABHAKAR | AAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 7 | 6-KALPRAM | LR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | 7- JAMAL AHMAD | RS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | 8-SANTOSH KUMAR | NP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | 9- KANHAIYA LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | 10- RAZIA BANO | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | 11- RAM BHAWAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | 12- SUNDARI PANDEY | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | 14- SURYA MANI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | 15- SANJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 514 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 446 | 86.43% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| BJP | 43 | 8.33% | 2 | 405 | Poor |
| INC | 18 | 3.49% | 3 | 9 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.58% | 4 | 379 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.39% | 5 | 147 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.39% | 6 | 355 | Poor |
| LR | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 380 | Poor |
| NP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 398 | Poor |
| RS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 391 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 296, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.