PRIMARI PATHSHALA PURENARI PS 3
2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH
BJPBJP119 votes at this polling station
over 4- SURAJ SINGH (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH | BJP | 119 | 37.19% | |
| 2 | 4- SURAJ SINGH | SP | 108 | 33.75% | |
| 3 | 1- MOHD. ZAKI | BSP | 84 | 26.25% | |
| 4 | 3- RAMA KASHYAP | INC | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 5 | 8-SANTOSH KUMAR | NP | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | 14- SURYA MANI | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | 15- SANJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | 9- KANHAIYA LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | 10- RAZIA BANO | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | 11- RAM BHAWAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | 12- SUNDARI PANDEY | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | 13- SURAJ SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | 5- AJAY KUMAR PRABHAKAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | 6-KALPRAM | LR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | 7- JAMAL AHMAD | RS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 320 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 119 | 37.07% | 1 | 346 | Average |
| SP | 108 | 33.64% | 2 | 358 | Average |
| BSP | 84 | 26.17% | 3 | 5 | Average |
| INC | 4 | 1.25% | 4 | 257 | Poor |
| NP | 3 | 0.93% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.62% | 6 | 318 | Poor |
| LR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| RS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 170 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 291 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 296, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.