P.P. RAMNAGRA PS 73

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

484 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

273 34.3 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,066

Total turnout795votes cast at this station

Turnout %74.6% of this booth's roll

Male electors437

Female electors358

Vote share in this booth

of 795 votes counted

BJP 60.9% SP 26.5% BSP 2.4% AK 2.1% INC 1.9% NOTA 1.6% IND 1.5% PP 0.8% BSS 0.6% IJP 0.5% AAP 0.4% BMP 0.4% IND 0.4%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	484	60.88%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	211	26.54%
3	HARI RAM	BSP	19	2.39%
4	LAL JI	AK	17	2.14%
5	BABITA	INC	15	1.89%
6	NOTA	NOTA	13	1.64%
7	JAY MANGAL	IND	12	1.51%
8	MADAN LAL	PP	6	0.75%
9	HARIRAM	BSS	5	0.63%
10	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	4	0.50%
11	UDAY CHAND	AAP	3	0.38%
12	UMA DEVI	BMP	3	0.38%
13	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	3	0.38%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 795 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	484	60.88%	1	5	Strong
SP	211	26.54%	2	171	Average
BSP	19	2.39%	3	85	Poor
AK	17	2.14%	4	3	Poor
INC	15	1.89%	5	4	Poor
IND	15	1.89%	6	5	Poor
NOTA	13	1.64%	7	16	Poor
PP	6	0.75%	8	18	Poor
BSS	5	0.63%	9	23	Poor
IJP	4	0.50%	10	11	Poor
AAP	3	0.38%	11	20	Poor
BMP	3	0.38%	12	18	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.