P.P. BALPUR EXTRA ROOM PS 63

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

JAGRAM PASWAN

SPSP

209 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

80 21.5 pp

votes

over PALTOO RAM (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors767

Total turnout373votes cast at this station

Turnout %48.6% of this booth's roll

Male electors201

Female electors172

Vote share in this booth

of 373 votes counted

SP 56.0% BJP 34.6% BSP 5.4% NOTA 1.1% AAP 0.5% INC 0.5% AK 0.5% IJP 0.3% BSS 0.3% IND 0.3% IND 0.3% PP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	209	56.03%
2	PALTOO RAM	BJP	129	34.58%
3	HARI RAM	BSP	20	5.36%
4	NOTA	NOTA	4	1.07%
5	UDAY CHAND	AAP	2	0.54%
6	BABITA	INC	2	0.54%
7	LAL JI	AK	2	0.54%
8	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	1	0.27%
9	HARIRAM	BSS	1	0.27%
10	JAY MANGAL	IND	1	0.27%
11	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	1	0.27%
12	MADAN LAL	PP	1	0.27%
13	UMA DEVI	BMP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 373 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	209	56.03%	1	176	Strong
BJP	129	34.58%	2	364	Average
BSP	20	5.36%	3	82	Poor
NOTA	4	1.07%	4	225	Poor
INC	2	0.54%	7	372	Poor
IND	2	0.54%	8	284	Poor
AAP	2	0.54%	5	47	Poor
AK	2	0.54%	6	89	Poor
BSS	1	0.27%	9	147	Poor
IJP	1	0.27%	10	102	Poor
PP	1	0.27%	11	154	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	12	246	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.