P.P. CHAUKA KHURD PS 6

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

JAGRAM PASWAN

SPSP

308 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

251 62.8 pp

votes

over PALTOO RAM (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors589

Total turnout400votes cast at this station

Turnout %67.9% of this booth's roll

Male electors236

Female electors164

Vote share in this booth

of 400 votes counted

SP 77.0% BJP 14.3% BSP 2.8% NOTA 1.8% BSS 0.8% IND 0.8% IND 0.5% INC 0.5% AK 0.5% IJP 0.5% AAP 0.3% BMP 0.3% PP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	308	77.00%
2	PALTOO RAM	BJP	57	14.25%
3	HARI RAM	BSP	11	2.75%
4	NOTA	NOTA	7	1.75%
5	HARIRAM	BSS	3	0.75%
6	JAY MANGAL	IND	3	0.75%
7	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	2	0.50%
8	BABITA	INC	2	0.50%
9	LAL JI	AK	2	0.50%
10	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	2	0.50%
11	UDAY CHAND	AAP	1	0.25%
12	UMA DEVI	BMP	1	0.25%
13	MADAN LAL	PP	1	0.25%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 400 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	308	77.00%	1	42	Strong
BJP	57	14.25%	2	440	Weak
BSP	11	2.75%	3	145	Poor
NOTA	7	1.75%	4	103	Poor
IND	5	1.25%	5	112	Poor
BSS	3	0.75%	6	44	Poor
IJP	2	0.50%	8	35	Poor
INC	2	0.50%	9	369	Poor
AK	2	0.50%	7	71	Poor
AAP	1	0.25%	10	101	Poor
BMP	1	0.25%	11	79	Poor
PP	1	0.25%	12	132	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.