P.P. CHAMRUPUR EAST PART PS 432

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

207 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

54 13.7 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors989

Total turnout394votes cast at this station

Turnout %39.8% of this booth's roll

Male electors183

Female electors211

Vote share in this booth

of 394 votes counted

BJP 52.5% SP 38.8% INC 3.3% NOTA 1.3% IND 0.8% IND 0.8% BSP 0.8% BMP 0.5% BSS 0.5% PP 0.3% AK 0.3% AAP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	207	52.54%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	153	38.83%
3	BABITA	INC	13	3.30%
4	NOTA	NOTA	5	1.27%
5	JAY MANGAL	IND	3	0.76%
6	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	3	0.76%
7	HARI RAM	BSP	3	0.76%
8	UMA DEVI	BMP	2	0.51%
9	HARIRAM	BSS	2	0.51%
10	MADAN LAL	PP	1	0.25%
11	LAL JI	AK	1	0.25%
12	UDAY CHAND	AAP	1	0.25%
13	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 394 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	207	52.54%	1	252	Strong
SP	153	38.83%	2	300	Average
INC	13	3.30%	3	19	Poor
IND	6	1.52%	4	108	Poor
NOTA	5	1.27%	5	210	Poor
BSP	3	0.76%	6	337	Poor
BSS	2	0.51%	8	129	Poor
BMP	2	0.51%	7	74	Poor
AAP	1	0.25%	9	225	Poor
AK	1	0.25%	10	269	Poor
PP	1	0.25%	11	266	Poor
IJP	0	0.00%	12	445	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.