P.P. ADAR PAKAD PURVI BHAG PS 35

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

417 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

258 41.2 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,120

Total turnout627votes cast at this station

Turnout %56.0% of this booth's roll

Male electors317

Female electors310

Vote share in this booth

of 627 votes counted

BJP 66.5% SP 25.4% NOTA 2.9% INC 1.9% BSP 0.8% IND 0.8% BSS 0.6% IND 0.3% IJP 0.3% AK 0.2% AAP 0.2% BMP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	417	66.51%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	159	25.36%
3	NOTA	NOTA	18	2.87%
4	BABITA	INC	12	1.91%
5	HARI RAM	BSP	5	0.80%
6	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	5	0.80%
7	HARIRAM	BSS	4	0.64%
8	JAY MANGAL	IND	2	0.32%
9	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	2	0.32%
10	LAL JI	AK	1	0.16%
11	UDAY CHAND	AAP	1	0.16%
12	UMA DEVI	BMP	1	0.16%
13	MADAN LAL	PP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 627 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	417	66.51%	1	14	Strong
SP	159	25.36%	2	285	Average
NOTA	18	2.87%	3	7	Poor
INC	12	1.91%	4	22	Poor
IND	7	1.12%	5	54	Poor
BSP	5	0.80%	6	256	Poor
BSS	4	0.64%	7	29	Poor
IJP	2	0.32%	8	43	Poor
BMP	1	0.16%	11	92	Poor
AAP	1	0.16%	9	109	Poor
AK	1	0.16%	10	164	Poor
PP	0	0.00%	12	293	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.