U M V GANGAPUR ROOM NO1 PS 326

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

218 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

31 6.7 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors833

Total turnout462votes cast at this station

Turnout %55.5% of this booth's roll

Male electors229

Female electors233

Vote share in this booth

of 462 votes counted

BJP 47.2% SP 40.5% BSP 5.4% INC 2.6% NOTA 1.3% AAP 0.6% AK 0.6% PP 0.4% IND 0.4% BSS 0.4% IND 0.2% IJP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	218	47.19%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	187	40.48%
3	HARI RAM	BSP	25	5.41%
4	BABITA	INC	12	2.60%
5	NOTA	NOTA	6	1.30%
6	UDAY CHAND	AAP	3	0.65%
7	LAL JI	AK	3	0.65%
8	MADAN LAL	PP	2	0.43%
9	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	2	0.43%
10	HARIRAM	BSS	2	0.43%
11	JAY MANGAL	IND	1	0.22%
12	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	1	0.22%
13	UMA DEVI	BMP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 462 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	218	47.19%	1	225	Strong
SP	187	40.48%	2	221	Strong
BSP	25	5.41%	3	53	Poor
INC	12	2.60%	4	27	Poor
NOTA	6	1.30%	5	163	Poor
IND	3	0.65%	8	265	Poor
AAP	3	0.65%	6	31	Poor
AK	3	0.65%	7	63	Poor
BSS	2	0.43%	9	113	Poor
PP	2	0.43%	10	116	Poor
IJP	1	0.22%	11	184	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	12	390	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.