P.P. KHAGAIJOT UTTARI BHAG PS 303

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

347 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

193 36.4 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors825

Total turnout530votes cast at this station

Turnout %64.2% of this booth's roll

Male electors296

Female electors234

Vote share in this booth

of 530 votes counted

BJP 65.5% SP 29.1% INC 1.9% BSP 0.9% IND 0.8% AAP 0.4% BMP 0.4% AK 0.4% BSS 0.4% IND 0.2% NOTA 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	347	65.47%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	154	29.06%
3	BABITA	INC	10	1.89%
4	HARI RAM	BSP	5	0.94%
5	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	4	0.75%
6	UDAY CHAND	AAP	2	0.38%
7	UMA DEVI	BMP	2	0.38%
8	LAL JI	AK	2	0.38%
9	HARIRAM	BSS	2	0.38%
10	JAY MANGAL	IND	1	0.19%
11	NOTA	NOTA	1	0.19%
12	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	0	0.00%
13	MADAN LAL	PP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 530 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	347	65.47%	1	50	Strong
SP	154	29.06%	2	297	Average
INC	10	1.89%	3	61	Poor
IND	5	0.94%	5	143	Poor
BSP	5	0.94%	4	268	Poor
BSS	2	0.38%	9	105	Poor
BMP	2	0.38%	8	63	Poor
AAP	2	0.38%	6	76	Poor
AK	2	0.38%	7	127	Poor
NOTA	1	0.19%	10	433	Poor
PP	0	0.00%	12	387	Poor
IJP	0	0.00%	11	378	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.