U.M.V. MEDAILALPURWA ROOM NO 1 PS 296

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

345 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

99 15.7 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,072

Total turnout629votes cast at this station

Turnout %58.7% of this booth's roll

Male electors360

Female electors269

Vote share in this booth

of 629 votes counted

BJP 54.8% SP 39.1% BSP 2.1% INC 1.3% NOTA 1.1% IND 0.6% BSS 0.3% IND 0.3% IJP 0.2% PP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	345	54.85%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	246	39.11%
3	HARI RAM	BSP	13	2.07%
4	BABITA	INC	8	1.27%
5	NOTA	NOTA	7	1.11%
6	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	4	0.64%
7	HARIRAM	BSS	2	0.32%
8	JAY MANGAL	IND	2	0.32%
9	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	1	0.16%
10	MADAN LAL	PP	1	0.16%
11	LAL JI	AK	0	0.00%
12	UDAY CHAND	AAP	0	0.00%
13	UMA DEVI	BMP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 629 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	345	54.85%	1	52	Strong
SP	246	39.11%	2	102	Average
BSP	13	2.07%	3	132	Poor
INC	8	1.27%	4	102	Poor
NOTA	7	1.11%	5	122	Poor
IND	6	0.95%	6	101	Poor
BSS	2	0.32%	7	103	Poor
IJP	1	0.16%	8	175	Poor
PP	1	0.16%	9	228	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	12	381	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	10	377	Poor
AK	0	0.00%	11	396	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.