P.P. GONDIPUR NAYA BHAWAN ROOM NO 2 PS 295
PALTOO RAM
BJPBJP301 votes at this polling station
over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PALTOO RAM | BJP | 301 | 63.64% | |
| 2 | JAGRAM PASWAN | SP | 137 | 28.96% | |
| 3 | HARI RAM | BSP | 18 | 3.81% | |
| 4 | BABITA | INC | 10 | 2.11% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 1.06% | |
| 6 | RAVINDRA KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | MADAN LAL | PP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | LAL JI | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SANTOSH KUMARI | IJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | HARIRAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JAY MANGAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | UDAY CHAND | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | UMA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 473 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 301 | 63.64% | 1 | 93 | Strong |
| SP | 137 | 28.96% | 2 | 334 | Average |
| BSP | 18 | 3.81% | 3 | 94 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 2.11% | 4 | 60 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 1.06% | 5 | 193 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 227 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 396 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 397 | Poor |
| IJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 375 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 380 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 376 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 395 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.