P.P. CHULHABHARI PS 276

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

403 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

279 48.8 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,165

Total turnout572votes cast at this station

Turnout %49.1% of this booth's roll

Male electors289

Female electors283

Vote share in this booth

of 572 votes counted

BJP 70.5% SP 21.7% INC 2.1% BSP 1.0% NOTA 1.0% PP 0.9% IND 0.7% BSS 0.5% IND 0.3% AK 0.3% IJP 0.3% BMP 0.3% AAP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	403	70.45%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	124	21.68%
3	BABITA	INC	12	2.10%
4	HARI RAM	BSP	6	1.05%
5	NOTA	NOTA	6	1.05%
6	MADAN LAL	PP	5	0.87%
7	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	4	0.70%
8	HARIRAM	BSS	3	0.52%
9	JAY MANGAL	IND	2	0.35%
10	LAL JI	AK	2	0.35%
11	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	2	0.35%
12	UMA DEVI	BMP	2	0.35%
13	UDAY CHAND	AAP	1	0.17%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 572 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	403	70.45%	1	23	Strong
SP	124	21.68%	2	367	Weak
INC	12	2.10%	3	25	Poor
IND	6	1.05%	5	97	Poor
NOTA	6	1.05%	6	160	Poor
BSP	6	1.05%	4	243	Poor
PP	5	0.87%	7	30	Poor
BSS	3	0.52%	8	67	Poor
IJP	2	0.35%	11	67	Poor
BMP	2	0.35%	10	57	Poor
AK	2	0.35%	9	118	Poor
AAP	1	0.17%	12	181	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.