P.P. DUBAULIYA - FATTEJOT ROOM NO 2 PS 268
PALTOO RAM
BJPBJP349 votes at this polling station
over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PALTOO RAM | BJP | 349 | 62.21% | |
| 2 | JAGRAM PASWAN | SP | 167 | 29.77% | |
| 3 | NOTA | NOTA | 11 | 1.96% | |
| 4 | HARI RAM | BSP | 11 | 1.96% | |
| 5 | RAVINDRA KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.25% | |
| 6 | JAY MANGAL | IND | 6 | 1.07% | |
| 7 | BABITA | INC | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 8 | MADAN LAL | PP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | LAL JI | AK | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMARI | IJP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | UMA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | HARIRAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | UDAY CHAND | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 561 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 349 | 62.21% | 1 | 46 | Strong |
| SP | 167 | 29.77% | 2 | 268 | Average |
| IND | 13 | 2.32% | 3 | 7 | Poor |
| NOTA | 11 | 1.96% | 5 | 38 | Poor |
| BSP | 11 | 1.96% | 4 | 159 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.89% | 6 | 231 | Poor |
| PP | 2 | 0.36% | 7 | 113 | Poor |
| IJP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 161 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 151 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 225 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 364 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 389 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.