P.P. SONPUR BHUSAILWA PASHCHAMI BHAG PS 248
JAGRAM PASWAN
SPSP163 votes at this polling station
over PALTOO RAM (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAGRAM PASWAN | SP | 163 | 47.66% | |
| 2 | PALTOO RAM | BJP | 151 | 44.15% | |
| 3 | HARI RAM | BSP | 12 | 3.51% | |
| 4 | BABITA | INC | 7 | 2.05% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | HARIRAM | BSS | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 7 | JAY MANGAL | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | RAVINDRA KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | LAL JI | AK | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | UDAY CHAND | AAP | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | UMA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MADAN LAL | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SANTOSH KUMARI | IJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 342 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 163 | 47.66% | 1 | 278 | Strong |
| BJP | 151 | 44.15% | 2 | 339 | Strong |
| BSP | 12 | 3.51% | 3 | 139 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 2.05% | 4 | 130 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.88% | 5 | 300 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.58% | 7 | 323 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.58% | 6 | 100 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.29% | 8 | 173 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.29% | 9 | 219 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 357 | Poor |
| IJP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 357 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 367 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.