P.P. GAINGAHWA PURVI BHAG PS 193

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

195 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

39 9.9 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors970

Total turnout393votes cast at this station

Turnout %40.5% of this booth's roll

Male electors213

Female electors180

Vote share in this booth

of 393 votes counted

BJP 49.6% SP 39.7% NOTA 3.1% INC 1.5% BSP 1.5% IND 1.0% IND 0.8% BSS 0.8% AK 0.8% IJP 0.5% PP 0.5% AAP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	195	49.62%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	156	39.69%
3	NOTA	NOTA	12	3.05%
4	BABITA	INC	6	1.53%
5	HARI RAM	BSP	6	1.53%
6	JAY MANGAL	IND	4	1.02%
7	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	3	0.76%
8	HARIRAM	BSS	3	0.76%
9	LAL JI	AK	3	0.76%
10	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	2	0.51%
11	MADAN LAL	PP	2	0.51%
12	UDAY CHAND	AAP	1	0.25%
13	UMA DEVI	BMP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 393 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	195	49.62%	1	264	Strong
SP	156	39.69%	2	295	Average
NOTA	12	3.05%	3	23	Poor
IND	7	1.78%	4	63	Poor
INC	6	1.53%	6	180	Poor
BSP	6	1.53%	5	235	Poor
BSS	3	0.76%	8	60	Poor
AK	3	0.76%	7	57	Poor
IJP	2	0.51%	9	57	Poor
PP	2	0.51%	10	101	Poor
AAP	1	0.25%	11	156	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	12	332	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.