P.P. RATOHA ROOM NO 1 PS 191

AC 294 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

PALTOO RAM

BJPBJP

200 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

71 19.2 pp

votes

over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors689

Total turnout369votes cast at this station

Turnout %53.6% of this booth's roll

Male electors216

Female electors153

Vote share in this booth

of 369 votes counted

BJP 54.2% SP 35.0% NOTA 4.6% INC 1.6% BSP 1.6% BSS 0.8% AK 0.5% IND 0.5% IND 0.3% AAP 0.3% IJP 0.3% PP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	PALTOO RAM	BJP	200	54.20%
2	JAGRAM PASWAN	SP	129	34.96%
3	NOTA	NOTA	17	4.61%
4	BABITA	INC	6	1.63%
5	HARI RAM	BSP	6	1.63%
6	HARIRAM	BSS	3	0.81%
7	LAL JI	AK	2	0.54%
8	RAVINDRA KUMAR	IND	2	0.54%
9	JAY MANGAL	IND	1	0.27%
10	UDAY CHAND	AAP	1	0.27%
11	SANTOSH KUMARI	IJP	1	0.27%
12	MADAN LAL	PP	1	0.27%
13	UMA DEVI	BMP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 369 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 294

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	200	54.20%	1	259	Strong
SP	129	34.96%	2	352	Average
NOTA	17	4.61%	3	8	Poor
BSP	6	1.63%	4	234	Poor
INC	6	1.63%	5	179	Poor
IND	3	0.81%	7	244	Poor
BSS	3	0.81%	6	59	Poor
AK	2	0.54%	8	105	Poor
AAP	1	0.27%	9	154	Poor
IJP	1	0.27%	10	131	Poor
PP	1	0.27%	11	193	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	12	331	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.