P.P. GUJARPURWA - DAKHI PASHCHAMI BHAG PS 189
JAGRAM PASWAN
SPSP264 votes at this polling station
over PALTOO RAM (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAGRAM PASWAN | SP | 264 | 52.28% | |
| 2 | PALTOO RAM | BJP | 204 | 40.40% | |
| 3 | HARI RAM | BSP | 12 | 2.38% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 12 | 2.38% | |
| 5 | BABITA | INC | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 6 | MADAN LAL | PP | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | HARIRAM | BSS | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | JAY MANGAL | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | UDAY CHAND | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | UMA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAVINDRA KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | LAL JI | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SANTOSH KUMARI | IJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 505 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 264 | 52.28% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| BJP | 204 | 40.40% | 2 | 256 | Strong |
| BSP | 12 | 2.38% | 3 | 137 | Poor |
| NOTA | 12 | 2.38% | 4 | 22 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.19% | 5 | 178 | Poor |
| PP | 4 | 0.79% | 6 | 38 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 384 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 180 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 153 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 364 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 330 | Poor |
| IJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 335 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.