M.P.P.I.C.P.BHAG OLD BHAWAN ROOM NO 2 PS 136
PALTOO RAM
BJPBJP271 votes at this polling station
over JAGRAM PASWAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PALTOO RAM | BJP | 271 | 65.30% | |
| 2 | JAGRAM PASWAN | SP | 132 | 31.81% | |
| 3 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.45% | |
| 4 | HARI RAM | BSP | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 5 | BABITA | INC | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 6 | HARIRAM | BSS | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | UMA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | MADAN LAL | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | LAL JI | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | JAY MANGAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAVINDRA KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMARI | IJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | UDAY CHAND | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 415 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 271 | 65.30% | 1 | 132 | Strong |
| SP | 132 | 31.81% | 2 | 341 | Average |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.45% | 3 | 150 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.72% | 4 | 321 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.24% | 6 | 162 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 426 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.24% | 5 | 115 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 290 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 335 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 441 | Poor |
| IJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 298 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 335 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 294, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.