B. I. COLEGE UTRAULA R0N0 3 PS 80
RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA
BJPBJP341 votes at this polling station
over HASIB KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA | BJP | 341 | 67.93% | |
| 2 | HASIB KHAN | SP | 126 | 25.10% | |
| 3 | DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF DHIRU SINGH | INC | 17 | 3.39% | |
| 4 | ABDUL MANNAN | AIMIM | 8 | 1.59% | |
| 5 | RAM PRATAP | BSP | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI | RPS | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | Nota | NOTA | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | GYAN CHANDRA | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | GYANENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MUSTAQEEM AHMAD | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | PREMLAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SAHBAJ FARAZ KHAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SANCHIT | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 502 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 341 | 67.93% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 126 | 25.10% | 2 | 233 | Average |
| INC | 17 | 3.39% | 3 | 263 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 8 | 1.59% | 4 | 325 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 1.00% | 5 | 352 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.40% | 6 | 280 | Poor |
| RPS | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 197 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 472 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 257 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 293, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.