P.P. MADDOBHEEKH R0N0 2 PS 469
RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA
BJPBJP193 votes at this polling station
over HASIB KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA | BJP | 193 | 51.19% | |
| 2 | HASIB KHAN | SP | 124 | 32.89% | |
| 3 | DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF DHIRU SINGH | INC | 30 | 7.96% | |
| 4 | ABDUL MANNAN | AIMIM | 13 | 3.45% | |
| 5 | RAM PRATAP | BSP | 6 | 1.59% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI | RPS | 3 | 0.80% | |
| 7 | GYAN CHANDRA | IND | 3 | 0.80% | |
| 8 | GYANENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | IND | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | PREMLAL | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | SAHBAJ FARAZ KHAN | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | SANCHIT | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | MUSTAQEEM AHMAD | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 377 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 193 | 51.19% | 1 | 207 | Strong |
| SP | 124 | 32.89% | 2 | 241 | Average |
| INC | 30 | 7.96% | 3 | 148 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 13 | 3.45% | 4 | 265 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 2.12% | 5 | 321 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.59% | 6 | 347 | Poor |
| RPS | 3 | 0.80% | 7 | 173 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 481 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 478 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 293, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.