P.P. ATRAURA PS 434

AC 293 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA

BJPBJP

205 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

164 49.3 pp

votes

over HASIB KHAN (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors693

Total turnout333votes cast at this station

Turnout %48.1% of this booth's roll

Male electors148

Female electors185

Vote share in this booth

of 333 votes counted

BJP 61.6% SP 12.3% BSP 9.9% INC 8.4% IND 3.3% NOTA 1.8% IND 0.9% IND 0.6% IND 0.3% IND 0.3% RPS 0.3% AIMIM 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA	BJP	205	61.56%
2	HASIB KHAN	SP	41	12.31%
3	RAM PRATAP	BSP	33	9.91%
4	DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF DHIRU SINGH	INC	28	8.41%
5	GYAN CHANDRA	IND	11	3.30%
6	Nota	NOTA	6	1.80%
7	GYANENDRA KUMAR MISHRA	IND	3	0.90%
8	PREMLAL	IND	2	0.60%
9	SAHBAJ FARAZ KHAN	IND	1	0.30%
10	SANCHIT	IND	1	0.30%
11	AJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI	RPS	1	0.30%
12	ABDUL MANNAN	AIMIM	1	0.30%
13	MUSTAQEEM AHMAD	AAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 333 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

9 parties · AC 293

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	205	61.56%	1	185	Strong
SP	41	12.31%	2	463	Weak
BSP	33	9.91%	3	84	Poor
INC	28	8.41%	4	164	Poor
IND	18	5.41%	5	86	Poor
NOTA	6	1.80%	6	94	Poor
RPS	1	0.30%	8	393	Poor
AIMIM	1	0.30%	7	467	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	9	459	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 293, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.