P.P. JIGNI WEST PART PS 426

AC 293 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

HASIB KHAN

SPSP

160 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

44 13.8 pp

votes

over RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors743

Total turnout319votes cast at this station

Turnout %42.9% of this booth's roll

Male electors180

Female electors139

Vote share in this booth

of 319 votes counted

SP 50.2% BJP 36.4% INC 4.1% AIMIM 2.8% BSP 1.9% RPS 1.6% IND 1.3% IND 0.6% NOTA 0.6% IND 0.3% IND 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	HASIB KHAN	SP	160	50.16%
2	RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA	BJP	116	36.36%
3	DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF DHIRU SINGH	INC	13	4.08%
4	ABDUL MANNAN	AIMIM	9	2.82%
5	RAM PRATAP	BSP	6	1.88%
6	AJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI	RPS	5	1.57%
7	SANCHIT	IND	4	1.25%
8	GYANENDRA KUMAR MISHRA	IND	2	0.63%
9	Nota	NOTA	2	0.63%
10	GYAN CHANDRA	IND	1	0.31%
11	PREMLAL	IND	1	0.31%
12	SAHBAJ FARAZ KHAN	IND	0	0.00%
13	MUSTAQEEM AHMAD	AAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 319 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

9 parties · AC 293

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	160	50.16%	1	144	Strong
BJP	116	36.36%	2	343	Average
INC	13	4.08%	3	335	Poor
AIMIM	9	2.82%	4	315	Poor
IND	8	2.51%	5	319	Poor
BSP	6	1.88%	6	341	Poor
RPS	5	1.57%	7	55	Poor
NOTA	2	0.63%	8	330	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	9	455	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 293, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.