P.P. DODADEEH SOUTH PART ( MAJRA PARSAUNA) PS 38
HASIB KHAN
SPSP192 votes at this polling station
over RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HASIB KHAN | SP | 192 | 49.61% | |
| 2 | RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA | BJP | 87 | 22.48% | |
| 3 | RAM PRATAP | BSP | 58 | 14.99% | |
| 4 | DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF DHIRU SINGH | INC | 18 | 4.65% | |
| 5 | ABDUL MANNAN | AIMIM | 12 | 3.10% | |
| 6 | Nota | NOTA | 5 | 1.29% | |
| 7 | GYAN CHANDRA | IND | 4 | 1.03% | |
| 8 | GYANENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | IND | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | SANCHIT | IND | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 10 | MUSTAQEEM AHMAD | AAP | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 11 | SAHBAJ FARAZ KHAN | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI | RPS | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 13 | PREMLAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 387 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 192 | 49.61% | 1 | 76 | Strong |
| BJP | 87 | 22.48% | 2 | 392 | Weak |
| BSP | 58 | 14.99% | 3 | 38 | Weak |
| INC | 18 | 4.65% | 4 | 246 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 3.10% | 6 | 199 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 12 | 3.10% | 5 | 268 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 1.29% | 7 | 99 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.52% | 8 | 25 | Poor |
| RPS | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 293 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 293, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.