J. H. SCHOOL GAINDAS BUZURG (TINNIHWA) R0N0 1 PS 203
RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA
BJPBJP266 votes at this polling station
over HASIB KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMPRATAP VERMA URF SHASHIKANT VERMA | BJP | 266 | 75.14% | |
| 2 | HASIB KHAN | SP | 24 | 6.78% | |
| 3 | RAM PRATAP | BSP | 24 | 6.78% | |
| 4 | DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH URF DHIRU SINGH | INC | 14 | 3.95% | |
| 5 | GYAN CHANDRA | IND | 12 | 3.39% | |
| 6 | Nota | NOTA | 4 | 1.13% | |
| 7 | GYANENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | PREMLAL | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 9 | SAHBAJ FARAZ KHAN | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 10 | SANCHIT | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI | RPS | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 12 | ABDUL MANNAN | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MUSTAQEEM AHMAD | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 354 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 266 | 75.14% | 1 | 94 | Strong |
| BSP | 24 | 6.78% | 2 | 127 | Poor |
| SP | 24 | 6.78% | 3 | 481 | Poor |
| IND | 20 | 5.65% | 4 | 59 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 3.95% | 5 | 308 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 1.13% | 6 | 157 | Poor |
| RPS | 2 | 0.56% | 7 | 230 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 339 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 478 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 293, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.