P.P. RAJPUR PS 96
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND194 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 194 | 31.24% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 173 | 27.86% | |
| 3 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 162 | 26.09% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 25 | 4.03% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 18 | 2.90% | |
| 6 | ATMARAM | BSS | 8 | 1.29% | |
| 7 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 8 | 1.29% | |
| 8 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 7 | 1.13% | |
| 9 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 10 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 11 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 12 | MOTEEN | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 13 | SURESH | JAP | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 15 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 16 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 621 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 221 | 35.59% | 1 | 50 | Average |
| SP | 173 | 27.86% | 2 | 48 | Average |
| BJP | 162 | 26.09% | 3 | 280 | Average |
| BSP | 25 | 4.03% | 4 | 112 | Poor |
| INC | 18 | 2.90% | 5 | 42 | Poor |
| BSS | 8 | 1.29% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.81% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.81% | 8 | 172 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.64% | 9 | 16 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.