P.P. LALPUR VISHUNPUR UTTARI BHAG PS 93
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP280 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 280 | 47.14% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 133 | 22.39% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 117 | 19.70% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 21 | 3.54% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 10 | 1.68% | |
| 6 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 9 | 1.52% | |
| 7 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 8 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 9 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 10 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 11 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 12 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 13 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 14 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 15 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 16 | ATMARAM | BSS | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 594 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 280 | 47.14% | 1 | 76 | Strong |
| IND | 153 | 25.76% | 2 | 139 | Average |
| SP | 117 | 19.70% | 3 | 122 | Weak |
| NOTA | 21 | 3.54% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.68% | 5 | 139 | Poor |
| BSP | 9 | 1.52% | 6 | 256 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 79 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 255 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 215 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.