P.P. RATANWA ROOM NO. 2 PS 6
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP184 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 184 | 55.76% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 78 | 23.64% | |
| 3 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 20 | 6.06% | |
| 4 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 14 | 4.24% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 13 | 3.94% | |
| 6 | SURESH | JAP | 4 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 9 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 11 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 12 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 13 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 14 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 15 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 16 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.30% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 330 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 184 | 55.76% | 1 | 235 | Strong |
| SP | 78 | 23.64% | 2 | 231 | Weak |
| IND | 25 | 7.58% | 3 | 433 | Poor |
| BSP | 20 | 6.06% | 4 | 147 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 3.94% | 5 | 77 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 1.21% | 6 | 11 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.91% | 7 | 265 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.61% | 8 | 117 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.30% | 9 | 193 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.