P.P GULAWLI KHURD PASHCHIMI BHAG PS 58
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP257 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 257 | 52.88% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 139 | 28.60% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 41 | 8.44% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 19 | 3.91% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 6 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 7 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | MOTEEN | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 15 | ATMARAM | BSS | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 16 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 1 | 0.21% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 486 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 257 | 52.88% | 1 | 103 | Strong |
| IND | 156 | 32.10% | 2 | 134 | Average |
| SP | 41 | 8.44% | 3 | 378 | Poor |
| BSP | 19 | 3.91% | 4 | 156 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.44% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.41% | 6 | 119 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.41% | 7 | 69 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 246 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 419 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.