P.P PUREBAKA WEST PART PS 431
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP226 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 226 | 40.14% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 200 | 35.52% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 97 | 17.23% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 10 | 1.78% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 7 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 11 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 12 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 13 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 15 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 16 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 563 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 226 | 40.14% | 1 | 161 | Strong |
| IND | 214 | 38.01% | 2 | 59 | Average |
| SP | 97 | 17.23% | 3 | 165 | Weak |
| INC | 10 | 1.78% | 4 | 161 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.24% | 5 | 119 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 0.89% | 6 | 341 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.36% | 7 | 224 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 308 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 282 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.