P.U.M.VIDYALAY MAJGANVA ROOM NO 2 PS 43
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP178 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 178 | 51.45% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 67 | 19.36% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 30 | 8.67% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 20 | 5.78% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 17 | 4.91% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 2.02% | |
| 7 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 6 | 1.73% | |
| 8 | MOTEEN | IND | 6 | 1.73% | |
| 9 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 4 | 1.16% | |
| 10 | ATMARAM | BSS | 3 | 0.87% | |
| 11 | SURESH | JAP | 3 | 0.87% | |
| 12 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 13 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 14 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 15 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 16 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 346 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 178 | 51.45% | 1 | 251 | Strong |
| SP | 67 | 19.36% | 2 | 275 | Weak |
| IND | 51 | 14.74% | 3 | 377 | Weak |
| BSP | 20 | 5.78% | 4 | 150 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 4.91% | 5 | 47 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 2.02% | 6 | 102 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.87% | 8 | 30 | Poor |
| BSS | 3 | 0.87% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 323 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.