P.U.M.VIDYALAY MAJGANVA ROOM NO 1 PS 42
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP173 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 173 | 47.40% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 93 | 25.48% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 48 | 13.15% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 15 | 4.11% | |
| 5 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 6 | 1.64% | |
| 6 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 6 | 1.64% | |
| 7 | ATMARAM | BSS | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 8 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 10 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 11 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 12 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 13 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 15 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 16 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 365 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 173 | 47.40% | 1 | 261 | Strong |
| SP | 93 | 25.48% | 2 | 172 | Average |
| IND | 65 | 17.81% | 3 | 347 | Weak |
| BSP | 15 | 4.11% | 4 | 188 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.64% | 5 | 242 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 1.10% | 6 | 33 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 1.10% | 7 | 36 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 1.10% | 8 | 215 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.27% | 9 | 156 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.