P.P DHAWRAHRI ROOM NO 1 PS 417
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND149 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 149 | 46.56% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 110 | 34.38% | |
| 3 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 25 | 7.81% | |
| 4 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 22 | 6.88% | |
| 5 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 9 | 2.81% | |
| 6 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 2 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ATMARAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 320 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 159 | 49.69% | 1 | 130 | Strong |
| BJP | 110 | 34.38% | 2 | 365 | Average |
| BSP | 25 | 7.81% | 3 | 115 | Poor |
| SP | 22 | 6.88% | 4 | 434 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.63% | 5 | 409 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.31% | 6 | 276 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.31% | 7 | 420 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 438 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 438 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.