P.P SIKTIHWA ROOM NO 1 PS 407
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP311 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 311 | 57.06% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 133 | 24.40% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 50 | 9.17% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 21 | 3.85% | |
| 5 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 14 | 2.57% | |
| 6 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 7 | ATMARAM | BSS | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 8 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 545 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 311 | 57.06% | 1 | 48 | Strong |
| SP | 133 | 24.40% | 2 | 93 | Weak |
| IND | 53 | 9.72% | 3 | 372 | Poor |
| INC | 21 | 3.85% | 4 | 33 | Poor |
| BSP | 14 | 2.57% | 5 | 205 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.92% | 6 | 27 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 0.73% | 7 | 61 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.37% | 8 | 135 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.37% | 9 | 368 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.