C.M.I.C. TULSIPUR ROOM-2 PS 369
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP232 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 232 | 65.54% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 63 | 17.80% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 44 | 12.43% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 11 | 3.11% | |
| 5 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ATMARAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | SURESH | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 354 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 232 | 65.54% | 1 | 149 | Strong |
| IND | 64 | 18.08% | 2 | 351 | Weak |
| SP | 44 | 12.43% | 3 | 371 | Weak |
| INC | 11 | 3.11% | 4 | 128 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.56% | 5 | 396 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.28% | 6 | 407 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 401 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 415 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 414 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.