P.P VISHUNPUR EXTRA PS 358
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP145 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 145 | 47.54% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 113 | 37.05% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 34 | 11.15% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 1.31% | |
| 5 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.98% | |
| 6 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 7 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 10 | ATMARAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 305 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 145 | 47.54% | 1 | 315 | Strong |
| IND | 116 | 38.03% | 2 | 215 | Average |
| SP | 34 | 11.15% | 3 | 399 | Weak |
| NOTA | 4 | 1.31% | 4 | 256 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.66% | 5 | 394 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.66% | 6 | 399 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.33% | 7 | 285 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.33% | 8 | 260 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 408 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.