P.P. BHAGWANPUR PS 345
DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR
INCINC235 votes at this polling station
over BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 235 | 46.72% | |
| 2 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 162 | 32.21% | |
| 3 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 52 | 10.34% | |
| 4 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 16 | 3.18% | |
| 5 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 11 | 2.19% | |
| 6 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 9 | 1.79% | |
| 7 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 8 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 4 | 0.80% | |
| 9 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 10 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 12 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | ATMARAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 503 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INC | 235 | 46.72% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| BSP | 162 | 32.21% | 2 | 1 | Average |
| BJP | 52 | 10.34% | 3 | 425 | Weak |
| IND | 35 | 6.96% | 4 | 414 | Poor |
| SP | 16 | 3.18% | 5 | 444 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.40% | 6 | 353 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 254 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 408 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 400 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.