P.P. GUGAULI KALA EXTRA ROOM (PANCHPERWA) PS 33
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND87 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 87 | 50.58% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 38 | 22.09% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 19 | 11.05% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 13 | 7.56% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 2.33% | |
| 6 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 3 | 1.74% | |
| 7 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 8 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | ATMARAM | BSS | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 11 | MOTEEN | IND | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 12 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 13 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 14 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 172 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 91 | 52.91% | 1 | 279 | Strong |
| BJP | 38 | 22.09% | 2 | 435 | Weak |
| SP | 19 | 11.05% | 3 | 440 | Weak |
| BSP | 13 | 7.56% | 4 | 209 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 2.33% | 5 | 214 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 1.74% | 6 | 344 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 1.16% | 7 | 114 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.58% | 8 | 239 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.58% | 9 | 153 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.