P.P BADALPUR SOUTH PART PS 311
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND177 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 177 | 29.55% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 161 | 26.88% | |
| 3 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 160 | 26.71% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 44 | 7.35% | |
| 5 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 20 | 3.34% | |
| 6 | ATMARAM | BSS | 16 | 2.67% | |
| 7 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 8 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 9 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 11 | MOTEEN | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 12 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 13 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 599 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 189 | 31.55% | 1 | 80 | Average |
| SP | 161 | 26.88% | 2 | 62 | Average |
| BJP | 160 | 26.71% | 3 | 284 | Average |
| INC | 44 | 7.35% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| BSP | 20 | 3.34% | 5 | 153 | Poor |
| BSS | 16 | 2.67% | 6 | 5 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.67% | 7 | 54 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.50% | 8 | 299 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 118 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.