P.P SHIVCHARAN DEEH NARTH PART PS 276
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP198 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 198 | 46.92% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 137 | 32.46% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 46 | 10.90% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 23 | 5.45% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 6 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 7 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | ATMARAM | BSS | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 14 | NOTA | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 422 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 198 | 46.92% | 1 | 205 | Strong |
| SP | 137 | 32.46% | 2 | 86 | Average |
| IND | 54 | 12.80% | 3 | 370 | Weak |
| BSP | 23 | 5.45% | 4 | 133 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.18% | 5 | 285 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.71% | 6 | 96 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 290 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 230 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 431 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.