P.M.V. GULRIHA HISAMPUR ROOM-1 PS 265
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP128 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 128 | 41.42% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 89 | 28.80% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 58 | 18.77% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 12 | 3.88% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 7 | 2.27% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.94% | |
| 7 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 2 | 0.65% | |
| 9 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.65% | |
| 10 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 11 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 12 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 13 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | ATMARAM | BSS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 309 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 128 | 41.42% | 1 | 337 | Strong |
| SP | 89 | 28.80% | 2 | 188 | Average |
| IND | 65 | 21.04% | 3 | 349 | Weak |
| BSP | 12 | 3.88% | 4 | 227 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 2.27% | 5 | 232 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.94% | 6 | 146 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.65% | 7 | 112 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 385 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 372 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.