P.P MAHDEIYA PS 228
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP360 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 360 | 59.21% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 145 | 23.85% | |
| 3 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 40 | 6.58% | |
| 4 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 25 | 4.11% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 12 | 1.97% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | ATMARAM | BSS | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 9 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | MOTEEN | IND | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 11 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 15 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 16 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 608 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 360 | 59.21% | 1 | 19 | Strong |
| SP | 145 | 23.85% | 2 | 76 | Weak |
| BSP | 40 | 6.58% | 3 | 42 | Poor |
| IND | 37 | 6.09% | 4 | 412 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 1.97% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 0.99% | 6 | 142 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 0.66% | 7 | 55 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.49% | 8 | 86 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 211 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.