P.P KITHURA PS 219
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP156 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 156 | 63.41% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 59 | 23.98% | |
| 3 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 2.44% | |
| 6 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | ATMARAM | BSS | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 13 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 246 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 156 | 63.41% | 1 | 293 | Strong |
| SP | 59 | 23.98% | 2 | 313 | Weak |
| BSP | 8 | 3.25% | 3 | 278 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 3.25% | 4 | 200 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 2.85% | 5 | 454 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 2.44% | 6 | 139 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.41% | 8 | 208 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.41% | 7 | 274 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 374 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.