P.P BUDANTPUR PS 216
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP200 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 200 | 40.65% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 160 | 32.52% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 86 | 17.48% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 10 | 2.03% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.42% | |
| 6 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.42% | |
| 7 | ATMARAM | BSS | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 8 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 9 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 11 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 13 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 14 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 15 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 16 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 492 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 200 | 40.65% | 1 | 203 | Strong |
| IND | 177 | 35.98% | 2 | 101 | Average |
| SP | 86 | 17.48% | 3 | 199 | Weak |
| INC | 10 | 2.03% | 4 | 145 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.42% | 5 | 114 | Poor |
| BSS | 5 | 1.02% | 6 | 25 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.61% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.61% | 8 | 363 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 207 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.