P.P NANHUPUR PS 214
ZEBA RIZWAN
INDIND312 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 312 | 66.95% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 68 | 14.59% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 58 | 12.45% | |
| 4 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.50% | |
| 5 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 7 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 466 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 324 | 69.53% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| BJP | 68 | 14.59% | 2 | 410 | Weak |
| SP | 58 | 12.45% | 3 | 318 | Weak |
| BSP | 5 | 1.07% | 4 | 333 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.86% | 5 | 240 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.64% | 6 | 356 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 177 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 248 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 205 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.