P.P. NAND NAGAR (JUMMANDEEH) PS 182
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP235 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 235 | 43.36% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 209 | 38.56% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 36 | 6.64% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 32 | 5.90% | |
| 5 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 10 | 1.85% | |
| 6 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 6 | 1.11% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 8 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | MOTEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 542 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 235 | 43.36% | 1 | 139 | Strong |
| IND | 223 | 41.14% | 2 | 47 | Strong |
| SP | 36 | 6.64% | 3 | 392 | Poor |
| INC | 32 | 5.90% | 4 | 10 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.11% | 5 | 321 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.92% | 6 | 187 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.37% | 8 | 99 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 169 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 237 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.