P.P. AMBARPUR NAV NIRMIT BHAWAN ROOM NO 2 PS 159
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP241 votes at this polling station
over ZEBA RIZWAN (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 241 | 60.10% | |
| 2 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 75 | 18.70% | |
| 3 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 25 | 6.23% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 22 | 5.49% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 13 | 3.24% | |
| 6 | MOTEEN | IND | 5 | 1.25% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 1.00% | |
| 8 | ATMARAM | BSS | 4 | 1.00% | |
| 9 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 10 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 11 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 12 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 14 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 15 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 16 | SURESH | JAP | 1 | 0.25% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 401 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 241 | 60.10% | 1 | 131 | Strong |
| IND | 89 | 22.19% | 2 | 286 | Weak |
| SP | 25 | 6.23% | 3 | 420 | Poor |
| BSP | 22 | 5.49% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 3.24% | 5 | 81 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 1.00% | 6 | 47 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 1.00% | 7 | 234 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.50% | 8 | 138 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 184 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.