P.P. BANKATWA KHURD PATAJHI ROOM NO 2 PS 155
KAILASH NATH
BJPBJP358 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 358 | 67.55% | |
| 2 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 119 | 22.45% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 21 | 3.96% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 1.51% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 6 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 7 | ATMARAM | BSS | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | MOTEEN | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 14 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | SURESH | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 530 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 358 | 67.55% | 1 | 20 | Strong |
| SP | 119 | 22.45% | 2 | 119 | Weak |
| IND | 29 | 5.47% | 3 | 426 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 1.51% | 4 | 80 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.13% | 5 | 316 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.13% | 6 | 250 | Poor |
| BSS | 3 | 0.57% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 230 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.