P.P. MADARGARH ROOM NO 2 NAVNIRMIT PS 138
ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN
SPSP236 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 236 | 46.46% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 173 | 34.06% | |
| 3 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 33 | 6.50% | |
| 4 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 24 | 4.72% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 9 | 1.77% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 1.57% | |
| 7 | ATMARAM | BSS | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 8 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 9 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 10 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 11 | MOTEEN | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 13 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 14 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 15 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 16 | SURESH | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 508 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 236 | 46.46% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| BJP | 173 | 34.06% | 2 | 262 | Average |
| IND | 42 | 8.27% | 3 | 399 | Poor |
| BSP | 33 | 6.50% | 4 | 63 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.77% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 1.57% | 6 | 79 | Poor |
| BSS | 5 | 0.98% | 7 | 19 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 328 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.