I.C. MATHURA NAYA BHAVAN ROOM NO 6 PS 133
ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN
SPSP88 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 88 | 37.13% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 88 | 37.13% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 35 | 14.77% | |
| 4 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 14 | 5.91% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 6 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 2 | 0.84% | |
| 7 | ATMARAM | BSS | 2 | 0.84% | |
| 8 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | MOTEEN | IND | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 12 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | SURESH | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 16 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 237 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 88 | 37.13% | 1 | 387 | Average |
| SP | 88 | 37.13% | 2 | 192 | Average |
| IND | 39 | 16.46% | 3 | 406 | Weak |
| INC | 14 | 5.91% | 4 | 69 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 1.69% | 5 | 227 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.84% | 6 | 386 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.84% | 7 | 154 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 348 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 325 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.