P.P. KAILI KHUTHVA PASCHIMI BHAG PS 123
ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN
SPSP186 votes at this polling station
over KAILASH NATH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABDUL MASHHOOD KHAN | SP | 186 | 38.11% | |
| 2 | KAILASH NATH | BJP | 180 | 36.89% | |
| 3 | ZEBA RIZWAN | IND | 67 | 13.73% | |
| 4 | BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 17 | 3.48% | |
| 5 | DIPENDRA SINGH DIPANKAR | INC | 9 | 1.84% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 1.64% | |
| 7 | HIDAYTULLA | AAP | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 8 | DHEERAJ KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 9 | ATMARAM | BSS | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | SURESH | JAP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | MUJEEBURRAHMAN | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | MOTEEN | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | MOHAMMAD AAMIR SHAH | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | RAKSHARAM | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 15 | VIJAY PRATAP | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 16 | SHUBHAM SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 488 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 186 | 38.11% | 1 | 36 | Average |
| BJP | 180 | 36.89% | 2 | 246 | Average |
| IND | 78 | 15.98% | 3 | 313 | Weak |
| BSP | 17 | 3.48% | 4 | 174 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.84% | 5 | 171 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 1.64% | 6 | 78 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.02% | 7 | 17 | Poor |
| BSS | 3 | 0.61% | 8 | 80 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.41% | 9 | 88 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 291, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.